Editorial Standards

This page describes how the MindStudio blog is produced. We publish a high volume of coverage about AI models and tooling, and we think you should be able to find out how it is made without having to guess.

Who is accountable

Luis Chavez-Mattos, Director of Product, is the editor of this blog. That means responsibility for what appears here — the standards below, the corrections process, and the decision to publish or not — sits with a named person rather than a team label.

Elsewhere: X, LinkedIn. Those are the accounts this page claims in its structured data, so you can check that the name belongs to a real person rather than take it on trust.

Most posts are not written by a single human author, so we do not put a personal byline on them. Attaching a person's name to an article they did not write would tell you something untrue about how it was made. Where a post is written and reviewed by a person, that person is credited as the author.

What role AI plays

Our daily coverage of AI news is drafted by AI — specifically, by Anthropic's Claude — from primary source material, then checked and edited before it publishes. We are explicit about this because it is true and because you would reasonably want to know.

What that does and does not mean:

• Every draft is written from a specific source, not from recall. A post begins with the transcript or text of the thing it covers — a recorded technical talk, an announcement, a documentation page — and the draft is written against that material. It is not a model writing from memory about a topic.
• Hardware and benchmark claims get a second lookup. For posts about running models locally or about measured results, the pipeline attempts to fetch a primary source for the specific figures. When that lookup fails it is recorded and the post proceeds without those specifics rather than substituting a remembered number.
• Claims are expected to carry their source. Benchmark figures, prices, and specifications should cite where they came from, so you can check them rather than take our word for it.
• The revision passes are also AI. A draft is critiqued and rewritten by a second and third model pass before any person sees it. We say this plainly because "AI-drafted, human-edited" is often used to imply more human involvement than exists.
• A person reviews and releases each batch. Nothing publishes itself. Posts are staged for review and a person has to approve the batch before it reaches the site.
• We do not publish to fill a quota. When a day's source material does not support strong coverage, we publish less — often substantially less. Volume is capped by what the material justifies, not by a target.

What gets checked automatically

Some standards are enforced by software on every change, because a rule that depends on someone remembering it eventually fails quietly. Before anything publishes, automated checks verify that internal links resolve, that a post is not a duplicate of an existing one, that required structure is present, and that specific claims we have retired do not reappear in new writing.

These checks block publication when they fail. They are not advisory.

Corrections

We get things wrong. When we do, we correct the post rather than quietly deleting it, and posts that have been substantively updated carry an "Updated" date alongside the original publication date.

We also run corrections in bulk when a fact changes underneath us — when a product we described is discontinued, renamed, or repriced, we go back and fix the coverage that referenced it rather than leaving it to age.

If you find an error, tell us. Email support@mindstudio.ai with the URL and what is wrong. We would rather hear it from you than leave it up.

What we do not do

• We do not invent bylines. No fictional authors, no personas, no stock-photo experts.
• We do not publish paid coverage as editorial. If a post is sponsored, it says so.
• We do not fabricate figures. A number we cannot source does not go in, and "approximately" is not a substitute for having checked.
• We do not write about competitors dishonestly. Comparisons name real tradeoffs, including the ones that do not favour us.

Independence

MindStudio is a commercial company and this blog exists in part to reach people who might use our product. That is a real interest and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What it does not do is decide what we say about anyone else's product — coverage of competing tools is written to be accurate first, and a comparison that concluded in our favour by omitting something would be worth less than one that did not.

The blog is published by GoMeta, Inc., trading as MindStudio.